West Ham councillor John Whitworth on why residents should vote for the committee model in the upcoming governance referendum:
May 6th is the date, not only for the election of the London Mayor and Greater London Assembly Member, but also for the important Newham Governance Referendum. This comes 20 years after this borough voted to have one of the country’s first Directly-Elected Mayors in a referendum which was perhaps not widely nor fully understood. Newham was one of only 11 authorities which voted to adopt the Mayor model and there are currently just 15, with many more referendums proposing a Mayor being lost than won. Since 2002, the voters of Stoke-on-Trent, Hartlepool and Torbay have opted to abandon the Mayor model they had previously adopted, two for the Leader and Cabinet and one for the Committee model.
Sir Robin Wales, elected Mayor of Newham in 2002, remained in office until he was defeated by Cllr Rokhsana Fiaz in the selection for the Labour Party’s Mayoral candidate in 2018. Of those who believed this model would work better with Cllr Fiaz in the post, many also felt that the DEM model was in any case flawed. She expressed the view that this model had not worked well for Newham and pledged, if elected, to hold a referendum on its future by May 2021.
How the full powers of the Mayor are used depends greatly on the incumbent’s character but, according to the Local Government Act 2000, the Mayor – elected separately from the councillors and therefore of higher status – appoints and dismisses Cabinet members. Stemming from this authority, the Mayor is able to ensure the Cabinet’s assent and exercise considerable influence over the councillors belonging to the dominant party.
In contrast, under the Committee model the Council delegates decision-making powers to committees corresponding to Council directorates, such as Adults & Health and Inclusive Economy & Housing. Full Council elects the chairs of these committees and the Council Leader, and has direct responsibility for the overall policy framework and the budget.
The campaign group, Newham Voting for Change, believes that the Committee system is more democratic, equal and inclusive than the DEM system because all councillors participate in making policy. Working in committees encourages co-operation rather than division, talent is nurtured and expertise developed more productively, and all councillors are more accessible and accountable for the Council’s actions.
Residents will hopefully participate in the referendum in large numbers to play a role in shaping Newham’s future.
The article originally appeared in Newham Voices, a new independent community newspaper distributed around the borough.
For more information about the campaign for a committee system, check out the website at https://newhamforchange.org/ or ‘like’ the Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/newhamvotingforchange.
The campaign is also raising funds and you can donate at https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/newham-for-change
forestgatedotnet 
Very interesting article. We’ll see on May 6th of course whether the electorate does have any better understanding than it did 20 years ago of what is actually going on in this borough, most of which remains shrouded in secrecy. The recent FT piece on a virus-ridden and poverty-stricken Newham made no mention, for example, of the mix of UK-resident and absentee multimillionaire landlords operating and flourishing in Newham.
Complete secrecy also surrounds lobbying groups in this borough, i.e. the social composition of lobby groups, their political and religious affiliations, the actual purpose of their lobbying, and the rules governing lobbying in Newham in relation to what is allowed and what, if anything, is forbidden. All this is a very long way from being “open and transparent” at present.
In the light of recent, highly disturbing allegations, there are also serious questions to be asked here about decision-making with regard to everything to do with the allocation of taxpayers’ and council taxpayers’ money.
A thorough overhaul of housing policy in Newham is also a matter of urgency in view of the endemic overcrowding and ghettoization that has long been actively fostered by Newham Council through an anarchic planning system and a long-standing and ongoing raft of wildcat property conversions – including an epidemic of building on gardens – which have clearly been responsible for accelerating the spread of Coronavirus throughout the borough, surrounding boroughs and home counties.
There are equally searching questions to be asked about the current “multicultural” model in this borough and the extent to which it is actually driving separation, lawlessness and animus.
J. M.
________________________________
Not very clear what you mean by “lobbying groups”, could you expand? Newham was the first Council in the UK to introduce Borough-wide landlord licencing. Any evidence of illegal building work or landlord crime, please make specific complaints.