Archive | Uncategorized RSS feed for this section

Wrong to buy

1 Jul

A Freedom of Information request has revealed that between January 2011 and May 2015 Newham council sold 501 properties under Right to Buy legislation.

These properties had a book value of almost £82 million, but due to statutory discounts the council received just £42 million. 

Analysis of the data shows that the average value of each home sold was £163,224 and the average discount was £79,461, leaving Newham with receipts of just £83,763 per sale.

Sales by postcode were:

Postcode Number Valuation Sale price Discount
E16 94 £14,401,100 £7,189,300 £7,211,800
E12 56 £8,296,500 £3,890,270 £4,406,230
E15 85 £14,586,900 £7,773,458 £6,813,442
E7 45 £7,653,200 £4,092,380 £3,560,820
E6 128 £20,828,995 £10,562,717 £10,266,278
CM13 11 £2,188,400 £1,432,400 £756,000
E13 72 £11,872,350 £5,979,780 £5,892,570
RM13 3 £486,000 £252,300 £233,700
E11 4 £727,000 £346,200 £380,800
E14 1 £245,000 £145,000 £100,000
E18 1 £360,000 £260,000 £100,000
E* 1 £130,000 £41,600 £88,400
Total 501 £81,775,445 £41,965,405 £39,810,040

 * as listed by Newham in the FOI response

Of course, the council can rightly point out that it had no choice but to sell these homes – ‘right to buy’ is the law. But it can’t escape responsibility for other policies that are reducing the stock of social homes in the borough – for example it’s own NewShare scheme to sell off empty council houses on a shared ownership basis and its decision to keep hundreds of properties on the Carpenters Estate empty. Plus, of course, its repeated failure to enforce its own targets for affordable homes in new developments.

With the Tory government determined to expand ‘right to buy’ to housing associations it more vital than ever that the stock of affordable and social housing is increased. Newham has to do everything it can to make sure this happens.

Changing London

30 Jun

Author, journalist and blogger Cory Doctorow is leaving London and taking his family to Los Angeles:

The short version is, we want to live in a city whose priorities are around making a livable place to work, raise our family, and run our respective small businesses. But London is a city whose two priorities are turning itself into a playground for the most corrupt global elites who are turning neighbourhoods into soulless collections of empty, high-rise safe-deposit boxes in the sky; and continuing to encourage the feckless, reckless criminality of the finance industry (these two facts are not unrelated) …

… We’ve seen the writing on the wall: this is not a city for families. It’s not a city for people running small firms. It’s not a city for people who earn their living in the arts. We’ve given it the best we have, and we’re getting out because we can.

On Thursday (2nd July) Forest Gate North Labour party is hosting a public meeting at Coffee7 on ‘Changing London’. The city is in a turbo-capitalist induced death spiral. Unless we take action now London will become a hollowed out zombie city.

#MissingType

9 Jun

Stratford Missing Type

Str_tf_rd St_ti_n has lost its As and Os in support of National Blood Week.

#MissingType

Better late than never

5 Jun

Six months after I submitted it, my FOI request on the East Ham Town Hall fiasco has finally been answered.

Here’s what they had to say, with my original questions and some additional commentary:

1. [Could you please tell me] Why item 11, East Ham Town Hall Campus Update, for the cabinet meeting held on 17th July 2014 was withdrawn? 

Response – The report to Cabinet was withdrawn in July 2014 to allow for all required information to be obtained and collated. 

Comment: This response suggests the problems were known about – if not yet quantified – at least as early as July 2014, but the September cabinet meeting was the first time elected members were told. Does this square with the mayor’s repeated assertion that action was taken as soon as the problems came to light?

2. Is there a steering committee for the East Ham Town Hall Campus (EHTHC) redevelopment project, as there is for the re-build of the Atherton Centre in Forest Gate?


Response – An East Ham Campus Programme Board was established in November 2014 and they convene on a monthly basis. Prior to this Board being established it was simply called a programme board. 


Comment: The only difference appears to be the capitalisation in the name. When was the (lower case) programme board established?

3. If so, please provide a list of all current and past members of the EHTHC steering committee, the organisations they represent and the dates of their membership. Where members are council officers, please state the department or directorate for which they work.

Response – All members of the Programme Board are LBN officers. The Chief Executive chairs the meeting and representatives from the following services are members of the Board:

  • Kim Bromley-Derry – Chief Executive
  • 
James Thomas – Director of Commissioning (Children’s Services)
  • 
Siobhan Fry – Principal Lawyer

  • Paul Durrant – Senior Business Partner Strategic Commissioning and Community

  • Deborah Hindson – One source MD

  • Mark Butler – Director of Asset Management Services

  • Gary Bird – Interim Head of Communications 


Comment: That’s the current membership; who was on the original board? In evidence to Overview and Scrutiny (OSC) Kim Bromley-Derry insisted no membership list was kept. This answer is consistent with that, but I remain sceptical.

4. Please provide a list of dates of meetings of the steering committee, along with copies of agendas and minutes. 


Response – Please find attached the following: 


  • 12th November 2014: Agenda states 10th November but held on 12th 
  • 25th November 2014
  • 
1st December 2014

  • 12th January 2015 
  • 
9th February 2015: No agenda was despatched for this meeting 
  • 16th March 2015 


Please note that the name of a junior officer has been redacted.

Comment: Again, these are meetings of the new (upper case) Programme Board. Kim Bromley-Derry said at OSC no minutes were kept of the old board. But reports submitted to it were used to compile the report Cabinet received at their September meeting, so there was some documentation. Perhaps OSC should ask to see it.


5. What project management framework does Newham work within? (e.g. PRINCE2, PMBOK, etc.) 


Response – Newham Council has recently developed a new Project management methodology called MAPP (Managing and Achieving Programmes and Projects) which is embedded in an automated ICT solution called Verto. This work has evolved into the implementation of a corporate PMO. MAPP methodology and Verto system are mandatory to use in every new project at Newham. 


Comment: The clear implication here is that Newham had NO project management framework in place until now. This is truly shocking.

6. Please provide a copy of the project charter and the project initiation document (or their equivalents in the project management framework you use) for the EHTHC redevelopment project 
 

Response – As this project was initiated before the introduction of MAPP, these documents are not available. 

Comment: To someone who has worked in public sector project management this is simply unbelievable.

7. Which mayoral advisor’s portfolio currently includes oversight of the EHTHC project? 


Response – As this project crosses over a number of portfolios, Sir Robin Wales and Councillor Lester Hudson have oversight.


8. Which mayoral advisor’s portfolio included oversight of the EHTHC project prior to the election in May 2014? 


Response – Councillor Conor McAuley. 


Comment: This will be news to Cllr McAuley. He gave evidence to OSC in March that his involvement was limited to shepherding the initial phase through the planning process. After that responsibility passed to Lester Hudson and Andrew Baikie. 

9. Which of the council’s scrutiny committees has oversight of major building and 
redevelopment projects such the EHTHC and Atherton Centre?

Response – This is dependant on the nature of the scrutiny being undertaken but it is likely that Building Projects would come under Regeneration Scrutiny Commission. However, the work plans of all Scrutiny Commissions are approved by the Chair of Overview and Scrutiny who can determine which commission is most appropriate including Overview and Scrutiny Commission. 


Comment: We know that OSC itself has taken an interest in East Ham Town Hall, but only after the problems were publicly revealed. They  have yet to publish their report, so we will have to wait and see what that has to say.

The loan arranger

8 Apr

The minutes of the council meeting on 23 February include a section called Members Question Time. I don’t recall seeing this before, so perhaps it’s a recent innovation (or I haven’t been paying proper attention – which is entirely possible).

One particular bit caught my eye, which I’ll quote without further comment (though my emphasis added):

Councillor John Gray to Councillor Lester Hudson:

I note that in Agenda item 14 Annual Treasury Strategy Statement 3.2.2 on Borrowing Strategy (page 55) that the Council will not borrow more than it needs purely in order to profit from the investment of extra sums borrowed. However, is this in conflict with recent statements that in the future Newham will earn income from loans it makes and that this is the sort of commercial money making activity that the Council should engage in?

Answer:

Cllr Hudson advised that the Treasury statement was self explanatory and referred members to pages 151- 153 of the report which provides information on the Council’s borrowing and Capital Program. If the Council can borrow at a low rate and lend at commercial rates this adds value to the Council and enables us to extract income to cross subsidise where there are holes in the budget. 

Greetings

26 Mar

Absolute Cock

I’ve just been given some samples of a new greetings card produced by a local artist. The inside has been left blank for your own personal message.

They’re on sale now via his website at very reasonable prices – just £10 for a pack of 5.

That’s Easter sorted!

More scrutiny

25 Mar

I was live tweeting from the oversight and scrutiny commission meeting on the East Ham Town Hall campus and Newham 6th Form Collegiate last night.

You can read the stream, plus some additional commentary, on Storify.

Sir Robin talks immigration, diversity and cuts

19 Mar

The Mayor was interviewed on Nick Ferrari’s LBC show on 17 March 2015 about the impact of immigration on the local community and services.

Inadequate

17 Mar

 Whipps X CQC

The Care Quality Commission has published its report on the quality of care provided at Whipps Cross University Hospital.

As you can see, it is pretty damning.

The report identified a number of very significant weaknesses, in particular poor leadership, low staff morale, insufficient numbers of staff, and an over-reliance on agency and temporary staff. As a result proper protocols and procedures were not followed, patient information was not tracked and monitoring was inconsistent.

Large scale job losses, pay ‘down banding’ and ‘a culture of bullying and harassment’ were all contributory factors. The NHS trust that runs the hospital – Barts – has been put into special measures.

For those of us living in the north of the borough Whipps is far easier to get to than Newham General. So, despite being in Waltham Forest, it’s our local hospital. 

And it’s nowhere near good enough.

UPDATE: According to councillor Dianne Walls on Twitter, Newham’s health and social care scrutiny commission will be taking evidence from both the CQC and Whipps Cross management in April: “We need to know what it means for Newham residents when one of our main hospitals is deemed inadequate, even though it is in Waltham Forest.”

The civilised thing to do

10 Mar

An excellent piece by Zoe Williams in the Guardian about the Green party conference and why delegates remain upbeat, despite recent difficulties.

This bit in particular caught my eye:

being outside acceptability has allowed the party to slough off the accepted wisdoms that both shackle and amalgamate the other parties. Tax is the obvious example: today the deputy leader, Amelia Womack, promised to axe all tuition fees, and to pay for it from general taxation: yup, that old chestnut. Not a graduate tax, or a fee-based system that was really a tax, but an actual, progressive tax, asking the people with the most to pay for something that would improve the entire country – not because they benefited from it themselves (though, in likelihood, they did), but because it’s the civilised thing to do.

Tax is the price we pay to live in a civilised society. It really is that simple.