Tag Archives: Steve Brayshaw

Desperate Times in Royal Docks

3 May

Cllr Steve Brayshaw

A row has broken out in Royal Victoria ward after Labour figures questioned Green candidate Rob Callender over an address discrepancy on nomination paperwork, first reported by On London

Labour councillor and chief whip Steve Brayshaw—who is currently fighting to keep his seat in the ward—reported his Green Party rival to the Metropolitan Police. The accusation? “Election fraud” because Callender’s nomination papers listed his home as “address in Royal Victoria,” while the electoral register places him a few streets away  in the neighbouring Royal Albert ward.

Callender has strongly denied any wrongdoing. In a response posted to local WhatsApp and Facebook groups, he clarified that he signed his forms with the standard disclosure “address in Newham.” Somewhere between his signature and the printing of the ballot papers, an administrative or processing error occurred.

“I have never claimed to live in Royal Victoria Ward, but have referred more broadly to the Royal Docks. As an experienced candidate… I can categorically say that I did not submit anything false.”

Callender also pointed out that he lives in the Royal Docks area regardless—just across the ward boundary in Royal Albert. The council has confirmed this doesn’t affect the validity of his nomination.

Honestly, this all feels extraordinarily petty from Labour. Nobody seriously believes voters in Royal Victoria are making their decision based on whether a candidate lives a few streets one side or the other of a ward boundary within the same Royal Docks community. The idea that this is some grave democratic scandal – let alone ‘election fraud’ – is difficult to take seriously.

More importantly, the fact Labour has chosen to elevate such a minor technical issue says a great deal about the political mood in the borough. Royal Victoria is one of the Greens’ stated target seats in this election, and Labour clearly knows it faces a genuine challenge. If the party was confident about its record and support, it would talk about housing, public services, transport and the future of the area — not calling the Met over a nomination form.

This is not the first hint that Brayshaw knows he’s in trouble. Back at the council’s budget setting meeting in February he devoted his entire contribution to the debate to a culture war rant about the Greens.

If the best Labour chief whip can do is play amateur detective with address labels, it’s a clear sign he knows his time in might be up. And that is the real story here.

Noor comment

4 Mar

The Newham Recorder’s report on this week’s standards committee hearing contains comments from Labour group chief whip Steve Bradshaw:

“It’s very sad that in the borough where we’re trying to get rid of rogue landlords and beds in sheds that we have someone who would kick people out at midnight and then hide behind the Localism Act.

“We have evidence to show that when the [tenants] tried to make a complaint he said ‘no, no’ and made them go through him. It’s almost a hostage situation. It’s an abuse of power.”

Strong words. And ones that wouldn’t have been said without the approval of Sir Robin. Whatever political cover Ahmed Noor had from the leadership has very obviously gone.

Cllr Kay Scoresby, who sits on the committee asked:

“What do we have to do to get him more than a slap on the wrist?

“Newham is an authority that claims to be the best on enforcement. Can we get assurances he will be dealt with properly despite being a councillor?”

That should worry Noor. This week the council’s website proudly trumpeted a £40,000 fine imposed on a landlord who failed to licence her poorly managed rental property as a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO). Which is not a million miles away from what Ahmed Noor did at 238 Romford Road.